@proceedings{125581,
  author = {Caren M. Walker and Joseph Jay Williams and Tania Lombrozo and Alison Gopnik},
  editor = { and  and },
  title = {Explaining influences children{\textquoteright}s reliance on evidence and prior knowledge in causal induction},
  abstract = {<p>In two studies, we examine how prompting 5- and 6-year-olds to explain observed outcomes influences causal learning. In Study 1, children were presented with data consistent with two causal regularities. Explainers outperformed controls in generalizing the regularity that accounted for more observations. In Study 2, this regularity was pitted against an alternative that accounted for fewer observations but was consistent with prior knowledge. Explainers were less likely than controls to generalize the regularity that accounted for more observations. These findings suggest that explaining drives children to favor causal regularities that they expect to generalize, where current observations and prior knowledge both provide cues.</p>
},
  year = {2012},
  journal = {Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
  pages = {1114-1119},
  publisher = {Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society},
  language = {eng},
}